F1 Machine Learning Essentials: Optimizing F1 Score with Feature Selection

Learn how to use feature selection methods to reduce the number of features and improve the F1 score of your classification models.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

In this tutorial, you will learn how to use various feature selection methods to reduce the dimensionality of your data and improve the F1 score of your classification models. Feature selection is a process of selecting a subset of features that are most relevant and informative for the prediction task. By applying feature selection, you can achieve several benefits, such as:

Reducing the computational cost and complexity of your models
Improving the generalization and performance of your models
Enhancing the interpretability and understanding of your models
Avoiding the curse of dimensionality and overfitting

But how do you choose which features to keep and which ones to discard? There are many methods and criteria for feature selection, and each one has its own advantages and limitations. In this tutorial, you will explore some of the most common feature selection methods, such as:

Filter methods, which use statistical tests to measure the relevance of each feature
Wrapper methods, which use a search algorithm to find the optimal subset of features
Embedded methods, which integrate feature selection within the learning algorithm

You will also learn how to compare and evaluate different feature selection methods on a sample dataset, and how to optimize the F1 score of your classification models. F1 score is a metric that combines precision and recall, and it is widely used to measure the performance of classification models, especially when the classes are imbalanced. By using feature selection, you can increase the F1 score of your models by removing noisy and redundant features that might affect the accuracy and robustness of your predictions.

Are you ready to dive into the world of feature selection and F1 score optimization? Let’s get started!

2. What is F1 Score and Why is it Important?

F1 score is a metric that measures the quality of a classification model. It is calculated as the harmonic mean of precision and recall, which are two important aspects of a classifier’s performance. Precision is the ratio of true positives to all predicted positives, and recall is the ratio of true positives to all actual positives. In other words, precision tells you how accurate your predictions are, and recall tells you how complete your predictions are.

But why do we need to combine precision and recall into a single metric? Why can’t we just use one of them to evaluate our models? The answer is that precision and recall are often inversely related, meaning that improving one can lower the other. For example, if you want to increase your precision, you might make your model more conservative and only predict positive when you are very confident. This will reduce the number of false positives, but it might also increase the number of false negatives, lowering your recall. Conversely, if you want to increase your recall, you might make your model more aggressive and predict positive more often. This will reduce the number of false negatives, but it might also increase the number of false positives, lowering your precision.

Therefore, using only precision or recall can be misleading and biased, as they do not capture the trade-off between them. F1 score, on the other hand, balances both precision and recall and gives a more comprehensive picture of your model’s performance. A high F1 score means that your model has both high precision and high recall, which is desirable for most classification tasks.

F1 score is especially important when you are dealing with imbalanced classes, where one class is much more frequent than the other. For example, if you are building a model to detect fraud, you might have a lot more non-fraudulent transactions than fraudulent ones. In this case, using accuracy as a metric can be misleading, as your model can achieve a high accuracy by simply predicting non-fraudulent for every transaction. However, this would result in a very low recall, as your model would miss most of the fraudulent transactions. F1 score, on the other hand, would penalize your model for having a low recall, and encourage it to improve its detection rate.

Now that you know what F1 score is and why it is important, you might be wondering how to optimize it for your classification models. One way to do that is to use feature selection, which is the topic of the next section.

3. What is Feature Selection and How Does it Help?

Feature selection is a process of selecting a subset of features that are most relevant and informative for the prediction task. Features are the attributes or variables that describe your data, such as age, gender, income, etc. Depending on the source and quality of your data, you might have many features, some of which might be redundant, irrelevant, or noisy. These features can affect the performance and interpretability of your classification models, and make them more prone to overfitting and underfitting.

Overfitting occurs when your model learns too much from the training data and fails to generalize to new and unseen data. Underfitting occurs when your model learns too little from the training data and fails to capture the underlying patterns and relationships. Both overfitting and underfitting can result in poor F1 score and low accuracy of your predictions.

By using feature selection, you can reduce the number of features and keep only the ones that are most useful for your classification task. This can help you to:

Reduce the computational cost and complexity of your models, as they will have fewer parameters to learn and optimize
Improve the generalization and performance of your models, as they will be less affected by noise and variance
Enhance the interpretability and understanding of your models, as they will be simpler and more transparent
Avoid the curse of dimensionality and overfitting, as they will have fewer dimensions to explore and fit

But how do you decide which features to select and which ones to discard? There are many methods and criteria for feature selection, and each one has its own advantages and limitations. In the next section, you will learn about some of the most common feature selection methods, such as filter methods, wrapper methods, and embedded methods.

4. Common Feature Selection Methods

In this section, you will learn about some of the most common feature selection methods that you can use to optimize the F1 score of your classification models. These methods can be broadly categorized into three types: filter methods, wrapper methods, and embedded methods. Each type has its own advantages and limitations, and you will see how they differ in terms of their approach, complexity, and performance.

Filter methods are the simplest and fastest type of feature selection methods. They use statistical tests to measure the relevance of each feature with respect to the target variable, and rank the features according to their scores. Then, you can select the top-k features with the highest scores, or apply a threshold to filter out the features with low scores. Some of the common statistical tests that filter methods use are:

Chi-squared test, which measures the dependence between categorical features and the target variable
Mutual information, which measures the amount of information that one feature provides about another feature or the target variable
Variance threshold, which removes the features with low variance, as they are likely to be constant or have little impact on the prediction

Filter methods are easy to implement and computationally efficient, as they do not involve any learning algorithm. However, they also have some drawbacks, such as:

They do not consider the interactions and dependencies among the features, as they evaluate each feature individually
They do not take into account the performance of the classification model, as they only use the target variable as the criterion
They might be biased by the distribution and scale of the features, as some statistical tests are sensitive to these factors

Wrapper methods are more complex and sophisticated type of feature selection methods. They use a search algorithm to find the optimal subset of features that maximizes the performance of the classification model. The search algorithm can be exhaustive, such as trying all possible combinations of features, or heuristic, such as using greedy or randomized strategies to explore the feature space. Some of the common search algorithms that wrapper methods use are:

Forward selection, which starts with an empty set of features and adds one feature at a time that improves the model performance the most
Backward elimination, which starts with the full set of features and removes one feature at a time that deteriorates the model performance the least
Recursive feature elimination, which iteratively trains the model and eliminates the features with the lowest weights or coefficients

They are computationally expensive and time-consuming, as they require multiple iterations of training and evaluating the model
They are prone to overfitting and instability, as they might select features that are specific to the training data and the chosen model
They might suffer from the curse of dimensionality and local optima, as they might explore only a fraction of the feature space and miss the global optimum

Embedded methods are a hybrid type of feature selection methods that combine the advantages of filter methods and wrapper methods. They integrate feature selection within the learning algorithm, and select the features that are most relevant for the model during the training process. Some of the common learning algorithms that embedded methods use are:

Lasso regression, which applies a regularization term that penalizes the features with large coefficients and shrinks them to zero
Decision tree, which splits the nodes based on the features that maximize the information gain or decrease the impurity
Support vector machine, which uses a kernel function to map the features to a higher-dimensional space and select the features that are closest to the margin

Embedded methods are more efficient and robust, as they select the features that are most suitable for the model during the training process. However, they also have some drawbacks, such as:

They are specific to the learning algorithm, as they use the criteria and parameters of the model to select the features
They are less interpretable and transparent, as they do not provide a clear ranking or score for the features
They might be affected by the hyperparameters and optimization methods of the model, as they might influence the feature selection process

As you can see, each type of feature selection method has its own pros and cons, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution for every problem. You need to consider the characteristics of your data, the objectives of your classification task, and the resources and constraints of your project. In the next section, you will learn how to compare and evaluate different feature selection methods on a sample dataset, and how to optimize the F1 score of your classification models.

4.1. Filter Methods

In this section, you will learn how to use filter methods to select the most relevant features for your classification task. Filter methods are based on statistical tests that measure the relationship between each feature and the target variable. They rank the features according to their scores, and you can choose the top-k features with the highest scores, or apply a threshold to filter out the features with low scores.

Filter methods are easy to implement and computationally efficient, as they do not involve any learning algorithm. However, they also have some limitations, such as ignoring the interactions and dependencies among the features, and not taking into account the performance of the classification model.

There are many types of statistical tests that filter methods can use, but in this tutorial, you will focus on two of them: chi-squared test and mutual information. These tests are suitable for categorical features and target variables, which are common in classification tasks. You will see how to apply these tests on a sample dataset, and how to compare their results.

The sample dataset that you will use is the Adult dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. This dataset contains information about 32,561 individuals from the 1994 US Census database, and the goal is to predict whether their income is above or below 50K dollars per year. The dataset has 14 features, 6 of which are categorical: workclass, education, marital-status, occupation, relationship, and race. The target variable is also categorical, with two possible values: <=50K and >50K.

To use filter methods, you need to import some libraries and load the dataset. You can use the pandas library to read the data from a CSV file, and the sklearn library to encode the categorical features and the target variable. You can also use the numpy library to perform some numerical operations. Here is the code to do that:

# Import libraries
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder

# Load the dataset
df = pd.read_csv("adult.csv")

# Encode the categorical features and the target variable
le = LabelEncoder()
for col in ["workclass", "education", "marital-status", "occupation", "relationship", "race", "income"]:
    df[col] = le.fit_transform(df[col])

Now that you have the dataset ready, you can apply the chi-squared test and the mutual information test to select the most relevant features. You will see how to do that in the next subsections.

4.2. Wrapper Methods

In this section, you will learn how to use wrapper methods to select the most relevant features for your classification task. Wrapper methods are based on a search algorithm that finds the optimal subset of features that maximizes the performance of the classification model. The search algorithm can be exhaustive, such as trying all possible combinations of features, or heuristic, such as using greedy or randomized strategies to explore the feature space.

Wrapper methods are more effective and accurate, as they consider the interactions and dependencies among the features, and take into account the performance of the classification model. However, they also have some limitations, such as being computationally expensive and time-consuming, prone to overfitting and instability, and suffering from the curse of dimensionality and local optima.

There are many types of search algorithms that wrapper methods can use, but in this tutorial, you will focus on two of them: forward selection and backward elimination. These algorithms are suitable for small to medium-sized datasets, as they have a reasonable computational cost and complexity. You will see how to apply these algorithms on the sample dataset, and how to compare their results.

The sample dataset that you will use is the same as the one in the previous section: the Adult dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. This dataset contains information about 32,561 individuals from the 1994 US Census database, and the goal is to predict whether their income is above or below 50K dollars per year. The dataset has 14 features, 6 of which are categorical: workclass, education, marital-status, occupation, relationship, and race. The target variable is also categorical, with two possible values: <=50K and >50K.

To use wrapper methods, you need to import some libraries and load the dataset. You can use the same code as in the previous section to do that:

# Import libraries
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder

# Load the dataset
df = pd.read_csv("adult.csv")

# Encode the categorical features and the target variable
le = LabelEncoder()
for col in ["workclass", "education", "marital-status", "occupation", "relationship", "race", "income"]:
    df[col] = le.fit_transform(df[col])

Now that you have the dataset ready, you can apply the forward selection and backward elimination algorithms to select the most relevant features. You will see how to do that in the next subsections.

4.3. Embedded Methods

Embedded methods are another type of feature selection methods that combine the advantages of filter and wrapper methods. Embedded methods perform feature selection as part of the learning process, meaning that they select the features that are most relevant for the specific model and data. Embedded methods can also adapt to the changes in the data and the model, and update the feature selection accordingly.

One of the most popular embedded methods is the Lasso regression, which is a linear regression model that applies a penalty to the coefficients of the features. The penalty is proportional to the absolute value of the coefficients, which means that the larger the coefficient, the larger the penalty. This penalty has the effect of shrinking the coefficients of the less important features to zero, effectively removing them from the model. The Lasso regression can also automatically tune the amount of penalty by using cross-validation, which makes it easier to find the optimal subset of features.

Another example of an embedded method is the Random Forest, which is an ensemble of decision trees that can handle both classification and regression problems. The Random Forest can measure the importance of each feature by calculating the average reduction in the impurity or the error that the feature contributes to the decision trees. The impurity or the error is a measure of how well the feature can split the data into homogeneous groups. The higher the impurity or the error, the worse the feature. The Random Forest can then rank the features by their importance and select the top ones for the final model.

Embedded methods have several benefits over filter and wrapper methods, such as:

They are more efficient and faster than wrapper methods, as they do not require multiple iterations of model training and evaluation
They are more accurate and robust than filter methods, as they take into account the interaction between the features and the model
They can handle nonlinear and complex relationships between the features and the target variable, as they use more advanced learning algorithms

However, embedded methods also have some limitations, such as:

They are more complex and harder to interpret than filter and wrapper methods, as they use black-box models that do not provide much insight into the feature selection process
They are more prone to overfitting and bias than filter and wrapper methods, as they might select the features that are optimal for the specific model and data, but not for the general problem
They are more dependent on the choice of the learning algorithm and the hyperparameters than filter and wrapper methods, as they might produce different results with different settings

In the next section, you will see how to compare and evaluate different feature selection methods on a sample dataset, and how to optimize the F1 score of your classification models.

5. Comparing Feature Selection Methods on a Sample Dataset

In this section, you will see how to compare and evaluate different feature selection methods on a sample dataset, and how to optimize the F1 score of your classification models. You will use the Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) dataset, which contains 569 instances of benign and malignant tumors, with 30 features each. The features are computed from a digitized image of a fine needle aspirate (FNA) of a breast mass, and describe characteristics of the cell nuclei present in the image. The goal is to predict whether the tumor is benign or malignant based on the features.

To compare and evaluate different feature selection methods, you will follow these steps:

Load and preprocess the dataset
Split the dataset into training and test sets
Apply different feature selection methods to the training set and select a subset of features
Train a classification model using the selected features and evaluate it on the test set
Compare the F1 score and the number of features of different models

For the classification model, you will use a logistic regression, which is a simple and widely used model for binary classification. You will also use the scikit-learn library, which is a popular and powerful tool for machine learning in Python. You can find the documentation and tutorials for scikit-learn here.

Let’s start by loading and preprocessing the dataset.

6. Conclusion

In this tutorial, you have learned how to use various feature selection methods to reduce the dimensionality of your data and improve the F1 score of your classification models. You have seen how feature selection can help you achieve several benefits, such as reducing the computational cost and complexity of your models, improving the generalization and performance of your models, enhancing the interpretability and understanding of your models, and avoiding the curse of dimensionality and overfitting.

You have also explored some of the most common feature selection methods, such as filter methods, wrapper methods, and embedded methods. You have learned how each method works, what are its advantages and limitations, and how to apply it to a sample dataset. You have compared and evaluated different feature selection methods on the Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) dataset, and you have seen how they affect the F1 score and the number of features of your logistic regression model.

By following this tutorial, you have gained a solid foundation in feature selection and F1 score optimization, which are essential skills for any machine learning practitioner. You can now apply these skills to your own datasets and problems, and experiment with different feature selection methods and models. You can also learn more about feature selection and F1 score by reading the following resources:

We hope you enjoyed this tutorial and learned something new and useful. Thank you for reading and happy learning!

7. References

In this section, you will find the references that were used to create this tutorial. You can use these references to learn more about the topics covered in this tutorial, or to cite them in your own work. The references are listed in alphabetical order by the first author’s last name, and follow the APA style format.

Brownlee, J. (2020). Feature Selection with Real and Categorical Data. Machine Learning Mastery. Retrieved from https://machinelearningmastery.com/feature-selection-with-real-and-categorical-data/
Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics, 21(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7
Dua, D., & Graff, C. (2019). UCI Machine Learning Repository. University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences. Retrieved from https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Breast+Cancer+Wisconsin+(Diagnostic)
Géron, A. (2019). Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, tools, and techniques to build intelligent systems. O’Reilly Media.
Kohavi, R., & John, G. H. (1997). Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence, 97(1-2), 273-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X
Mishra, P. (2020). F1 Score Optimization in Machine Learning. Analytics Vidhya. Retrieved from https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2020/09/f1-score-optimization-in-machine-learning/
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., … & Vanderplas, J. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(Oct), 2825-2830.
Sachan, D. (2018). Beyond Accuracy: Precision and Recall. Towards Data Science. Retrieved from https://towardsdatascience.com/beyond-accuracy-precision-and-recall-3da06bea9f6c
Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58(1), 267-288.
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 67(2), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x